Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support

Publicly accessible License 

U.S. energy and water systems are increasingly interdependent, often leading to cascading and compounding system failures when faced with acute and chronic hazards. Such stressors propagate across multiple spatial scales, typically starting with changing earth system dynamics (for example, droughts) that interact with the regional natural environment (for example, streamflow and temperatures), and affect the local built environment (for example, cities, reservoirs, hydropower generators, and conveyance pumps). Emerging water-intensive industries (e.g., advanced manufacturing, artificial-intelligence (AI) data centers, geothermal power, and hydraulic fracturing) further concentrate risk. Current modeling architectures rarely support this level of cross-sectoral coupling, with limited unifying and integrated tools for the joint planning and co-optimized operations of the sectors, or standardized selection of scenarios to stress test future conditions. While many modeling tools exist, they are typically focused on specific scales, time horizons, single hazard classes, and sectors in isolation, making it difficult to quickly identify joint vulnerabilities. Further, such models are often not actionable for decision-makers.

Across all three focal areas (energy for water, water for energy, and energy-water intersections) there is therefore a need for integrated modeling frameworks, co-produced between scientists and resource managers, that (i) include common scenario selection across sectors, (ii) connect existing water and energy system sector models, and global earth system and economic models, (iii) enable quick, practical risk screening to find the biggest vulnerabilities and early opportunities for action, before investing in deeper, more complex modeling, and (iv) provide tools for decision-support under deep uncertainty (DMDU).

In this white paper we describe the near-term opportunity to invest in model connection or "wrapper" tools that link data, scenarios, and assumptions between existing global and regional energy, water, and hazards models that were built for single sectors/hazards/time frames. Such connection tools, building on the advances in AI, can facilitate better communication between models across multiple scales and sectors, both vertical (global to regional to local) and horizontal (between energy and water sectors). Strategic investments in automated modules that link inputs and outputs across existing earth systems, integrated assessment, regional hydrology, water management, and grid models can enhance interoperability without requiring the development of new platforms from scratch. Practical triage tools are also needed so utilities can anticipate threats and prioritize actions without relying solely on heavy modeling, with deeper analyses available as needed.

The success of such model connection, triage, and decision-support tools can be measured in terms of reduced service interruptions and restoration time during system failures, decreased exposure to cascading failures, lower lifecycle and operations and maintenance cost, improved interoperability with data standards across agencies, decision-support and threat-triage tools incorporated by practitioners, and hazard-aware siting playbooks for utilities, operators, planners, and regulators.

Citation Formats

TY - DATA AB - U.S. energy and water systems are increasingly interdependent, often leading to cascading and compounding system failures when faced with acute and chronic hazards. Such stressors propagate across multiple spatial scales, typically starting with changing earth system dynamics (for example, droughts) that interact with the regional natural environment (for example, streamflow and temperatures), and affect the local built environment (for example, cities, reservoirs, hydropower generators, and conveyance pumps). Emerging water-intensive industries (e.g., advanced manufacturing, artificial-intelligence (AI) data centers, geothermal power, and hydraulic fracturing) further concentrate risk. Current modeling architectures rarely support this level of cross-sectoral coupling, with limited unifying and integrated tools for the joint planning and co-optimized operations of the sectors, or standardized selection of scenarios to stress test future conditions. While many modeling tools exist, they are typically focused on specific scales, time horizons, single hazard classes, and sectors in isolation, making it difficult to quickly identify joint vulnerabilities. Further, such models are often not actionable for decision-makers. Across all three focal areas (energy for water, water for energy, and energy-water intersections) there is therefore a need for integrated modeling frameworks, co-produced between scientists and resource managers, that (i) include common scenario selection across sectors, (ii) connect existing water and energy system sector models, and global earth system and economic models, (iii) enable quick, practical risk screening to find the biggest vulnerabilities and early opportunities for action, before investing in deeper, more complex modeling, and (iv) provide tools for decision-support under deep uncertainty (DMDU). In this white paper we describe the near-term opportunity to invest in model connection or "wrapper" tools that link data, scenarios, and assumptions between existing global and regional energy, water, and hazards models that were built for single sectors/hazards/time frames. Such connection tools, building on the advances in AI, can facilitate better communication between models across multiple scales and sectors, both vertical (global to regional to local) and horizontal (between energy and water sectors). Strategic investments in automated modules that link inputs and outputs across existing earth systems, integrated assessment, regional hydrology, water management, and grid models can enhance interoperability without requiring the development of new platforms from scratch. Practical triage tools are also needed so utilities can anticipate threats and prioritize actions without relying solely on heavy modeling, with deeper analyses available as needed. The success of such model connection, triage, and decision-support tools can be measured in terms of reduced service interruptions and restoration time during system failures, decreased exposure to cascading failures, lower lifecycle and operations and maintenance cost, improved interoperability with data standards across agencies, decision-support and threat-triage tools incorporated by practitioners, and hazard-aware siting playbooks for utilities, operators, planners, and regulators. AU - Rodriguez, Leila Hernandez A2 - Szinai, Julia A3 - Stokes-Draut, Jennifer A4 - Dwivedi, Dipankar A5 - Ulrich, Craig A6 - Holm, Jennifer A7 - Nakata, Rie A8 - Vahmani, Pouya DB - Energy-Water Resilience DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies DO - KW - energy generation KW - water demand KW - water availability KW - model linkages KW - scenario selection KW - risk screening KW - co-production KW - decision-support KW - integrated modeling KW - decision support KW - system failure LA - English DA - 2026/01/15 PY - 2026 PB - LBNL T1 - Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support UR - https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15 ER -
Export Citation to RIS
Rodriguez, Leila Hernandez, et al. Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support . LBNL, 15 January, 2026, Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15.
Rodriguez, L., Szinai, J., Stokes-Draut, J., Dwivedi, D., Ulrich, C., Holm, J., Nakata, R., & Vahmani, P. (2026). Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support . [Data set]. Energy-Water Resilience. LBNL. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15
Rodriguez, Leila Hernandez, Julia Szinai, Jennifer Stokes-Draut, Dipankar Dwivedi, Craig Ulrich, Jennifer Holm, Rie Nakata, and Pouya Vahmani. Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support . LBNL, January, 15, 2026. Distributed by Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15
@misc{EWR_Dataset_15, title = {Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support }, author = {Rodriguez, Leila Hernandez and Szinai, Julia and Stokes-Draut, Jennifer and Dwivedi, Dipankar and Ulrich, Craig and Holm, Jennifer and Nakata, Rie and Vahmani, Pouya}, abstractNote = {U.S. energy and water systems are increasingly interdependent, often leading to cascading and compounding system failures when faced with acute and chronic hazards. Such stressors propagate across multiple spatial scales, typically starting with changing earth system dynamics (for example, droughts) that interact with the regional natural environment (for example, streamflow and temperatures), and affect the local built environment (for example, cities, reservoirs, hydropower generators, and conveyance pumps). Emerging water-intensive industries (e.g., advanced manufacturing, artificial-intelligence (AI) data centers, geothermal power, and hydraulic fracturing) further concentrate risk. Current modeling architectures rarely support this level of cross-sectoral coupling, with limited unifying and integrated tools for the joint planning and co-optimized operations of the sectors, or standardized selection of scenarios to stress test future conditions. While many modeling tools exist, they are typically focused on specific scales, time horizons, single hazard classes, and sectors in isolation, making it difficult to quickly identify joint vulnerabilities. Further, such models are often not actionable for decision-makers.

Across all three focal areas (energy for water, water for energy, and energy-water intersections) there is therefore a need for integrated modeling frameworks, co-produced between scientists and resource managers, that (i) include common scenario selection across sectors, (ii) connect existing water and energy system sector models, and global earth system and economic models, (iii) enable quick, practical risk screening to find the biggest vulnerabilities and early opportunities for action, before investing in deeper, more complex modeling, and (iv) provide tools for decision-support under deep uncertainty (DMDU).

In this white paper we describe the near-term opportunity to invest in model connection or "wrapper" tools that link data, scenarios, and assumptions between existing global and regional energy, water, and hazards models that were built for single sectors/hazards/time frames. Such connection tools, building on the advances in AI, can facilitate better communication between models across multiple scales and sectors, both vertical (global to regional to local) and horizontal (between energy and water sectors). Strategic investments in automated modules that link inputs and outputs across existing earth systems, integrated assessment, regional hydrology, water management, and grid models can enhance interoperability without requiring the development of new platforms from scratch. Practical triage tools are also needed so utilities can anticipate threats and prioritize actions without relying solely on heavy modeling, with deeper analyses available as needed.

The success of such model connection, triage, and decision-support tools can be measured in terms of reduced service interruptions and restoration time during system failures, decreased exposure to cascading failures, lower lifecycle and operations and maintenance cost, improved interoperability with data standards across agencies, decision-support and threat-triage tools incorporated by practitioners, and hazard-aware siting playbooks for utilities, operators, planners, and regulators.
}, url = {https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {Energy-Water Resilience, LBNL, https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15}, note = {Accessed: 2026-04-06} }

Details

Data from Jan 15, 2026

Last updated Jan 15, 2026

Submitted Jan 15, 2026

Contact

Julia Szinai

Authors

Leila Hernandez Rodriguez

LBNL

Julia Szinai

LBNL

Jennifer Stokes-Draut

LBNL

Dipankar Dwivedi

LBNL

Craig Ulrich

LBNL

Jennifer Holm

LBNL

Rie Nakata

LBNL

Pouya Vahmani

LBNL

DOE Project Details

Project Name White Papers on Ideas to Advance Energy-Water Resilience

Project Lead

Project Number WP-015

Share

Submission Downloads