Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support
U.S. energy and water systems are increasingly interdependent, often leading to cascading and compounding system failures when faced with acute and chronic hazards. Such stressors propagate across multiple spatial scales, typically starting with changing earth system dynamics (for example, droughts) that interact with the regional natural environment (for example, streamflow and temperatures), and affect the local built environment (for example, cities, reservoirs, hydropower generators, and conveyance pumps). Emerging water-intensive industries (e.g., advanced manufacturing, artificial-intelligence (AI) data centers, geothermal power, and hydraulic fracturing) further concentrate risk. Current modeling architectures rarely support this level of cross-sectoral coupling, with limited unifying and integrated tools for the joint planning and co-optimized operations of the sectors, or standardized selection of scenarios to stress test future conditions. While many modeling tools exist, they are typically focused on specific scales, time horizons, single hazard classes, and sectors in isolation, making it difficult to quickly identify joint vulnerabilities. Further, such models are often not actionable for decision-makers.
Across all three focal areas (energy for water, water for energy, and energy-water intersections) there is therefore a need for integrated modeling frameworks, co-produced between scientists and resource managers, that (i) include common scenario selection across sectors, (ii) connect existing water and energy system sector models, and global earth system and economic models, (iii) enable quick, practical risk screening to find the biggest vulnerabilities and early opportunities for action, before investing in deeper, more complex modeling, and (iv) provide tools for decision-support under deep uncertainty (DMDU).
In this white paper we describe the near-term opportunity to invest in model connection or "wrapper" tools that link data, scenarios, and assumptions between existing global and regional energy, water, and hazards models that were built for single sectors/hazards/time frames. Such connection tools, building on the advances in AI, can facilitate better communication between models across multiple scales and sectors, both vertical (global to regional to local) and horizontal (between energy and water sectors). Strategic investments in automated modules that link inputs and outputs across existing earth systems, integrated assessment, regional hydrology, water management, and grid models can enhance interoperability without requiring the development of new platforms from scratch. Practical triage tools are also needed so utilities can anticipate threats and prioritize actions without relying solely on heavy modeling, with deeper analyses available as needed.
The success of such model connection, triage, and decision-support tools can be measured in terms of reduced service interruptions and restoration time during system failures, decreased exposure to cascading failures, lower lifecycle and operations and maintenance cost, improved interoperability with data standards across agencies, decision-support and threat-triage tools incorporated by practitioners, and hazard-aware siting playbooks for utilities, operators, planners, and regulators.
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - U.S. energy and water systems are increasingly interdependent, often leading to cascading and compounding system failures when faced with acute and chronic hazards. Such stressors propagate across multiple spatial scales, typically starting with changing earth system dynamics (for example, droughts) that interact with the regional natural environment (for example, streamflow and temperatures), and affect the local built environment (for example, cities, reservoirs, hydropower generators, and conveyance pumps). Emerging water-intensive industries (e.g., advanced manufacturing, artificial-intelligence (AI) data centers, geothermal power, and hydraulic fracturing) further concentrate risk. Current modeling architectures rarely support this level of cross-sectoral coupling, with limited unifying and integrated tools for the joint planning and co-optimized operations of the sectors, or standardized selection of scenarios to stress test future conditions. While many modeling tools exist, they are typically focused on specific scales, time horizons, single hazard classes, and sectors in isolation, making it difficult to quickly identify joint vulnerabilities. Further, such models are often not actionable for decision-makers.
Across all three focal areas (energy for water, water for energy, and energy-water intersections) there is therefore a need for integrated modeling frameworks, co-produced between scientists and resource managers, that (i) include common scenario selection across sectors, (ii) connect existing water and energy system sector models, and global earth system and economic models, (iii) enable quick, practical risk screening to find the biggest vulnerabilities and early opportunities for action, before investing in deeper, more complex modeling, and (iv) provide tools for decision-support under deep uncertainty (DMDU).
In this white paper we describe the near-term opportunity to invest in model connection or "wrapper" tools that link data, scenarios, and assumptions between existing global and regional energy, water, and hazards models that were built for single sectors/hazards/time frames. Such connection tools, building on the advances in AI, can facilitate better communication between models across multiple scales and sectors, both vertical (global to regional to local) and horizontal (between energy and water sectors). Strategic investments in automated modules that link inputs and outputs across existing earth systems, integrated assessment, regional hydrology, water management, and grid models can enhance interoperability without requiring the development of new platforms from scratch. Practical triage tools are also needed so utilities can anticipate threats and prioritize actions without relying solely on heavy modeling, with deeper analyses available as needed.
The success of such model connection, triage, and decision-support tools can be measured in terms of reduced service interruptions and restoration time during system failures, decreased exposure to cascading failures, lower lifecycle and operations and maintenance cost, improved interoperability with data standards across agencies, decision-support and threat-triage tools incorporated by practitioners, and hazard-aware siting playbooks for utilities, operators, planners, and regulators.
AU - Rodriguez, Leila Hernandez
A2 - Szinai, Julia
A3 - Stokes-Draut, Jennifer
A4 - Dwivedi, Dipankar
A5 - Ulrich, Craig
A6 - Holm, Jennifer
A7 - Nakata, Rie
A8 - Vahmani, Pouya
DB - Energy-Water Resilience
DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies
DO -
KW - energy generation
KW - water demand
KW - water availability
KW - model linkages
KW - scenario selection
KW - risk screening
KW - co-production
KW - decision-support
KW - integrated modeling
KW - decision support
KW - system failure
LA - English
DA - 2026/01/15
PY - 2026
PB - LBNL
T1 - Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support
UR - https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15
ER -
Rodriguez, Leila Hernandez, et al. Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support . LBNL, 15 January, 2026, Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15.
Rodriguez, L., Szinai, J., Stokes-Draut, J., Dwivedi, D., Ulrich, C., Holm, J., Nakata, R., & Vahmani, P. (2026). Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support . [Data set]. Energy-Water Resilience. LBNL. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15
Rodriguez, Leila Hernandez, Julia Szinai, Jennifer Stokes-Draut, Dipankar Dwivedi, Craig Ulrich, Jennifer Holm, Rie Nakata, and Pouya Vahmani. Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support . LBNL, January, 15, 2026. Distributed by Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15
@misc{EWR_Dataset_15,
title = {Building Resilient Energy-Water Systems: Integrated Modeling, Scenario Selection, and Near-Term Decision Support },
author = {Rodriguez, Leila Hernandez and Szinai, Julia and Stokes-Draut, Jennifer and Dwivedi, Dipankar and Ulrich, Craig and Holm, Jennifer and Nakata, Rie and Vahmani, Pouya},
abstractNote = {U.S. energy and water systems are increasingly interdependent, often leading to cascading and compounding system failures when faced with acute and chronic hazards. Such stressors propagate across multiple spatial scales, typically starting with changing earth system dynamics (for example, droughts) that interact with the regional natural environment (for example, streamflow and temperatures), and affect the local built environment (for example, cities, reservoirs, hydropower generators, and conveyance pumps). Emerging water-intensive industries (e.g., advanced manufacturing, artificial-intelligence (AI) data centers, geothermal power, and hydraulic fracturing) further concentrate risk. Current modeling architectures rarely support this level of cross-sectoral coupling, with limited unifying and integrated tools for the joint planning and co-optimized operations of the sectors, or standardized selection of scenarios to stress test future conditions. While many modeling tools exist, they are typically focused on specific scales, time horizons, single hazard classes, and sectors in isolation, making it difficult to quickly identify joint vulnerabilities. Further, such models are often not actionable for decision-makers.
Across all three focal areas (energy for water, water for energy, and energy-water intersections) there is therefore a need for integrated modeling frameworks, co-produced between scientists and resource managers, that (i) include common scenario selection across sectors, (ii) connect existing water and energy system sector models, and global earth system and economic models, (iii) enable quick, practical risk screening to find the biggest vulnerabilities and early opportunities for action, before investing in deeper, more complex modeling, and (iv) provide tools for decision-support under deep uncertainty (DMDU).
In this white paper we describe the near-term opportunity to invest in model connection or "wrapper" tools that link data, scenarios, and assumptions between existing global and regional energy, water, and hazards models that were built for single sectors/hazards/time frames. Such connection tools, building on the advances in AI, can facilitate better communication between models across multiple scales and sectors, both vertical (global to regional to local) and horizontal (between energy and water sectors). Strategic investments in automated modules that link inputs and outputs across existing earth systems, integrated assessment, regional hydrology, water management, and grid models can enhance interoperability without requiring the development of new platforms from scratch. Practical triage tools are also needed so utilities can anticipate threats and prioritize actions without relying solely on heavy modeling, with deeper analyses available as needed.
The success of such model connection, triage, and decision-support tools can be measured in terms of reduced service interruptions and restoration time during system failures, decreased exposure to cascading failures, lower lifecycle and operations and maintenance cost, improved interoperability with data standards across agencies, decision-support and threat-triage tools incorporated by practitioners, and hazard-aware siting playbooks for utilities, operators, planners, and regulators.
},
url = {https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Energy-Water Resilience, LBNL, https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/15},
note = {Accessed: 2026-04-06}
}
Details
Data from Jan 15, 2026
Last updated Jan 15, 2026
Submitted Jan 15, 2026
Contact
Julia Szinai
Authors
Keywords
energy generation, water demand, water availability, model linkages, scenario selection, risk screening, co-production, decision-support, integrated modeling, decision support, system failureDOE Project Details
Project Name White Papers on Ideas to Advance Energy-Water Resilience
Project Lead
Project Number WP-015
