Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV)

Publicly accessible License 

Floating photovoltaic projects, as well as those that span over waterways (i.e. canopy), present potential technological and economic advantages over ground-mounted systems that have fueled rapid global growth in installed capacity in recent years. Aside from expanding generation, FPV present numerous additional benefits (hereafter, co-benefits), such as improved panel efficiency and reduced land usage, others arising from hybrid FPV-hydropower systems (e.g., co-location and co-management), as well as others pertaining to water security, particularly in rural agricultural setting (e.g., reduced evaporation and water temperature from shading, improved water quality). The evidence for this wide range of co-benefits varies widely and measures of positive returns or advantages in FPV alternatives remain under-quantified.

Without reliable assessment and modeling, co-benefits cannot be appropriately considered during project planning. An improved understanding of project co-benefits and impacts on a per-acre basis, relative to alternatives in tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators, may support increasing deployment of FPV and canopy PV projects. For tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators to reach technical potential and account for co-benefits, we identify four priority areas: 1) Develop co-benefit knowledge base, 2) Define regulatory landscape for co-development, 3) Develop co-benefit assessment tools, and 4) Integrate FPV co-benefits in water-energy sector planning. Together, these steps can provide measurable and predictable indicators which can be quantified and localized into "co-benefit per hectare of FPV".

Citation Formats

TY - DATA AB - Floating photovoltaic projects, as well as those that span over waterways (i.e. canopy), present potential technological and economic advantages over ground-mounted systems that have fueled rapid global growth in installed capacity in recent years. Aside from expanding generation, FPV present numerous additional benefits (hereafter, co-benefits), such as improved panel efficiency and reduced land usage, others arising from hybrid FPV-hydropower systems (e.g., co-location and co-management), as well as others pertaining to water security, particularly in rural agricultural setting (e.g., reduced evaporation and water temperature from shading, improved water quality). The evidence for this wide range of co-benefits varies widely and measures of positive returns or advantages in FPV alternatives remain under-quantified. Without reliable assessment and modeling, co-benefits cannot be appropriately considered during project planning. An improved understanding of project co-benefits and impacts on a per-acre basis, relative to alternatives in tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators, may support increasing deployment of FPV and canopy PV projects. For tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators to reach technical potential and account for co-benefits, we identify four priority areas: 1) Develop co-benefit knowledge base, 2) Define regulatory landscape for co-development, 3) Develop co-benefit assessment tools, and 4) Integrate FPV co-benefits in water-energy sector planning. Together, these steps can provide measurable and predictable indicators which can be quantified and localized into "co-benefit per hectare of FPV". AU - Fluet-Chouinard, Etienne A2 - Jorgensen, Jed A3 - Cotter, Emma D. A4 - Niazi, Hassan A5 - Wild, Thomas A6 - Chalishazar, Vishvas A7 - Pracheil, Brenda A8 - Griffiths, Natalie A9 - Hansen, Carly A10 - Golden, Brett A11 - Chowdhury, Kamal DB - Energy-Water Resilience DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies DO - KW - floating photovoltaics KW - reservoirs KW - hydropower KW - water quality KW - FPV KW - panel efficiency KW - reduced land usage KW - assessment KW - modeling KW - project planning LA - English DA - 2026/01/16 PY - 2026 PB - PNNL T1 - Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV) UR - https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33 ER -
Export Citation to RIS
Fluet-Chouinard, Etienne, et al. Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV). PNNL, 16 January, 2026, Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33.
Fluet-Chouinard, E., Jorgensen, J., Cotter, E., Niazi, H., Wild, T., Chalishazar, V., Pracheil, B., Griffiths, N., Hansen, C., Golden, B., & Chowdhury, K. (2026). Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV). [Data set]. Energy-Water Resilience. PNNL. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33
Fluet-Chouinard, Etienne, Jed Jorgensen, Emma D. Cotter, Hassan Niazi, Thomas Wild, Vishvas Chalishazar, Brenda Pracheil, Natalie Griffiths, Carly Hansen, Brett Golden, and Kamal Chowdhury. Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV). PNNL, January, 16, 2026. Distributed by Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33
@misc{EWR_Dataset_33, title = {Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV)}, author = {Fluet-Chouinard, Etienne and Jorgensen, Jed and Cotter, Emma D. and Niazi, Hassan and Wild, Thomas and Chalishazar, Vishvas and Pracheil, Brenda and Griffiths, Natalie and Hansen, Carly and Golden, Brett and Chowdhury, Kamal}, abstractNote = {Floating photovoltaic projects, as well as those that span over waterways (i.e. canopy), present potential technological and economic advantages over ground-mounted systems that have fueled rapid global growth in installed capacity in recent years. Aside from expanding generation, FPV present numerous additional benefits (hereafter, co-benefits), such as improved panel efficiency and reduced land usage, others arising from hybrid FPV-hydropower systems (e.g., co-location and co-management), as well as others pertaining to water security, particularly in rural agricultural setting (e.g., reduced evaporation and water temperature from shading, improved water quality). The evidence for this wide range of co-benefits varies widely and measures of positive returns or advantages in FPV alternatives remain under-quantified.

Without reliable assessment and modeling, co-benefits cannot be appropriately considered during project planning. An improved understanding of project co-benefits and impacts on a per-acre basis, relative to alternatives in tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators, may support increasing deployment of FPV and canopy PV projects. For tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators to reach technical potential and account for co-benefits, we identify four priority areas: 1) Develop co-benefit knowledge base, 2) Define regulatory landscape for co-development, 3) Develop co-benefit assessment tools, and 4) Integrate FPV co-benefits in water-energy sector planning. Together, these steps can provide measurable and predictable indicators which can be quantified and localized into "co-benefit per hectare of FPV".}, url = {https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {Energy-Water Resilience, PNNL, https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33}, note = {Accessed: 2026-04-06} }

Details

Data from Jan 16, 2026

Last updated Jan 16, 2026

Submitted Jan 16, 2026

Contact

Alison Colotelo

Authors

Etienne Fluet-Chouinard

PNNL

Jed Jorgensen

PNNL

Emma D. Cotter

PNNL

Hassan Niazi

PNNL

Thomas Wild

PNNL

Vishvas Chalishazar

PNNL

Brenda Pracheil

PNNL

Natalie Griffiths

ORNL

Carly Hansen

ORNL

Brett Golden

Farmers Conservation Alliance

Kamal Chowdhury

University of Maryland

DOE Project Details

Project Name White Papers on Ideas to Advance Energy-Water Resilience

Project Lead

Project Number WP-033

Share

Submission Downloads