Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV)
Floating photovoltaic projects, as well as those that span over waterways (i.e. canopy), present potential technological and economic advantages over ground-mounted systems that have fueled rapid global growth in installed capacity in recent years. Aside from expanding generation, FPV present numerous additional benefits (hereafter, co-benefits), such as improved panel efficiency and reduced land usage, others arising from hybrid FPV-hydropower systems (e.g., co-location and co-management), as well as others pertaining to water security, particularly in rural agricultural setting (e.g., reduced evaporation and water temperature from shading, improved water quality). The evidence for this wide range of co-benefits varies widely and measures of positive returns or advantages in FPV alternatives remain under-quantified.
Without reliable assessment and modeling, co-benefits cannot be appropriately considered during project planning. An improved understanding of project co-benefits and impacts on a per-acre basis, relative to alternatives in tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators, may support increasing deployment of FPV and canopy PV projects. For tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators to reach technical potential and account for co-benefits, we identify four priority areas: 1) Develop co-benefit knowledge base, 2) Define regulatory landscape for co-development, 3) Develop co-benefit assessment tools, and 4) Integrate FPV co-benefits in water-energy sector planning. Together, these steps can provide measurable and predictable indicators which can be quantified and localized into "co-benefit per hectare of FPV".
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - Floating photovoltaic projects, as well as those that span over waterways (i.e. canopy), present potential technological and economic advantages over ground-mounted systems that have fueled rapid global growth in installed capacity in recent years. Aside from expanding generation, FPV present numerous additional benefits (hereafter, co-benefits), such as improved panel efficiency and reduced land usage, others arising from hybrid FPV-hydropower systems (e.g., co-location and co-management), as well as others pertaining to water security, particularly in rural agricultural setting (e.g., reduced evaporation and water temperature from shading, improved water quality). The evidence for this wide range of co-benefits varies widely and measures of positive returns or advantages in FPV alternatives remain under-quantified.
Without reliable assessment and modeling, co-benefits cannot be appropriately considered during project planning. An improved understanding of project co-benefits and impacts on a per-acre basis, relative to alternatives in tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators, may support increasing deployment of FPV and canopy PV projects. For tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators to reach technical potential and account for co-benefits, we identify four priority areas: 1) Develop co-benefit knowledge base, 2) Define regulatory landscape for co-development, 3) Develop co-benefit assessment tools, and 4) Integrate FPV co-benefits in water-energy sector planning. Together, these steps can provide measurable and predictable indicators which can be quantified and localized into "co-benefit per hectare of FPV".
AU - Fluet-Chouinard, Etienne
A2 - Jorgensen, Jed
A3 - Cotter, Emma D.
A4 - Niazi, Hassan
A5 - Wild, Thomas
A6 - Chalishazar, Vishvas
A7 - Pracheil, Brenda
A8 - Griffiths, Natalie
A9 - Hansen, Carly
A10 - Golden, Brett
A11 - Chowdhury, Kamal
DB - Energy-Water Resilience
DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies
DO -
KW - floating photovoltaics
KW - reservoirs
KW - hydropower
KW - water quality
KW - FPV
KW - panel efficiency
KW - reduced land usage
KW - assessment
KW - modeling
KW - project planning
LA - English
DA - 2026/01/16
PY - 2026
PB - PNNL
T1 - Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV)
UR - https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33
ER -
Fluet-Chouinard, Etienne, et al. Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV). PNNL, 16 January, 2026, Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33.
Fluet-Chouinard, E., Jorgensen, J., Cotter, E., Niazi, H., Wild, T., Chalishazar, V., Pracheil, B., Griffiths, N., Hansen, C., Golden, B., & Chowdhury, K. (2026). Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV). [Data set]. Energy-Water Resilience. PNNL. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33
Fluet-Chouinard, Etienne, Jed Jorgensen, Emma D. Cotter, Hassan Niazi, Thomas Wild, Vishvas Chalishazar, Brenda Pracheil, Natalie Griffiths, Carly Hansen, Brett Golden, and Kamal Chowdhury. Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV). PNNL, January, 16, 2026. Distributed by Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33
@misc{EWR_Dataset_33,
title = {Accounting for Water-Energy Co-Benefits of Floating Photovoltaics (FPV)},
author = {Fluet-Chouinard, Etienne and Jorgensen, Jed and Cotter, Emma D. and Niazi, Hassan and Wild, Thomas and Chalishazar, Vishvas and Pracheil, Brenda and Griffiths, Natalie and Hansen, Carly and Golden, Brett and Chowdhury, Kamal},
abstractNote = {Floating photovoltaic projects, as well as those that span over waterways (i.e. canopy), present potential technological and economic advantages over ground-mounted systems that have fueled rapid global growth in installed capacity in recent years. Aside from expanding generation, FPV present numerous additional benefits (hereafter, co-benefits), such as improved panel efficiency and reduced land usage, others arising from hybrid FPV-hydropower systems (e.g., co-location and co-management), as well as others pertaining to water security, particularly in rural agricultural setting (e.g., reduced evaporation and water temperature from shading, improved water quality). The evidence for this wide range of co-benefits varies widely and measures of positive returns or advantages in FPV alternatives remain under-quantified.
Without reliable assessment and modeling, co-benefits cannot be appropriately considered during project planning. An improved understanding of project co-benefits and impacts on a per-acre basis, relative to alternatives in tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators, may support increasing deployment of FPV and canopy PV projects. For tradeoff analyses carried out by developers and regulators to reach technical potential and account for co-benefits, we identify four priority areas: 1) Develop co-benefit knowledge base, 2) Define regulatory landscape for co-development, 3) Develop co-benefit assessment tools, and 4) Integrate FPV co-benefits in water-energy sector planning. Together, these steps can provide measurable and predictable indicators which can be quantified and localized into "co-benefit per hectare of FPV".},
url = {https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Energy-Water Resilience, PNNL, https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/33},
note = {Accessed: 2026-04-06}
}
Details
Data from Jan 16, 2026
Last updated Jan 16, 2026
Submitted Jan 16, 2026
Contact
Alison Colotelo
Authors
Keywords
floating photovoltaics, reservoirs, hydropower, water quality, FPV, panel efficiency, reduced land usage, assessment, modeling, project planningDOE Project Details
Project Name White Papers on Ideas to Advance Energy-Water Resilience
Project Lead
Project Number WP-033
