Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems
The focal area is identification and quantification of the risk of combined (compound) hazards on water and energy systems and their interactions. The existing challenge is addressing risk and consequences to energy and water systems by compound hazards is an emerging area of study. Individual hazards are typically well documented in the published literature, but information about combined risk and consequences still has many gaps. These gaps include:
1. Complexity of Hazard Interactions
2. Lack of Comprehensive Data and Inadequate Modeling Techniques
4. Regional Variability in Hazard Types and Policies
5. Uncertainty of Hazard Drivers and Compound Risk
Near-Term Opportunity: There are several opportunities for activities that could result in substantial gains in mitigating compound hazard effects on water and energy systems. Mitigation of compound hazards could have an immediate and high value impact on economic activities and public safety. A range of both physical and social science efforts is needed to identify, quantify, and communicate the existing and future risk of compound hazards. Progress towards addressing the risks for the energy and water systems requires an integration of federal, state, and local engagement. This engagement will consist of data sharing, numerical modeling, policy analysis, and public meetings. Near-term opportunities include:
1. Advances in Data Integration and Technologies
2. Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
3. Expansion of Climate and Hazard Modeling
4. Infrastructure Risk Assessments
5. Leveraging the National Risk Index
6. Resilience Policies
Success Measure: Success in quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems means improving the understanding of multi-hazard impacts, identifying critical vulnerabilities, and creating actionable pathways for mitigating risks. It also means transitioning from a reactionary system to one that is proactive, equitable, and resilient. These measures will ensure that critical infrastructure systems can continue to provide services sustainably, even in the face of increasingly complex and novel hazards.
Metrics for long-term success related to water and energy systems include:
- Reduced service disruptions during actual compound hazard events compared to historical baselines
- Decreased recovery times following compound events
- Targeted investments in critical vulnerabilities identified through assessment
- Improved planning/response coordination between energy and water sectors
- Enhanced equity in service maintenance across different communities
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - The focal area is identification and quantification of the risk of combined (compound) hazards on water and energy systems and their interactions. The existing challenge is addressing risk and consequences to energy and water systems by compound hazards is an emerging area of study. Individual hazards are typically well documented in the published literature, but information about combined risk and consequences still has many gaps. These gaps include:
1. Complexity of Hazard Interactions
2. Lack of Comprehensive Data and Inadequate Modeling Techniques
4. Regional Variability in Hazard Types and Policies
5. Uncertainty of Hazard Drivers and Compound Risk
Near-Term Opportunity: There are several opportunities for activities that could result in substantial gains in mitigating compound hazard effects on water and energy systems. Mitigation of compound hazards could have an immediate and high value impact on economic activities and public safety. A range of both physical and social science efforts is needed to identify, quantify, and communicate the existing and future risk of compound hazards. Progress towards addressing the risks for the energy and water systems requires an integration of federal, state, and local engagement. This engagement will consist of data sharing, numerical modeling, policy analysis, and public meetings. Near-term opportunities include:
1. Advances in Data Integration and Technologies
2. Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
3. Expansion of Climate and Hazard Modeling
4. Infrastructure Risk Assessments
5. Leveraging the National Risk Index
6. Resilience Policies
Success Measure: Success in quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems means improving the understanding of multi-hazard impacts, identifying critical vulnerabilities, and creating actionable pathways for mitigating risks. It also means transitioning from a reactionary system to one that is proactive, equitable, and resilient. These measures will ensure that critical infrastructure systems can continue to provide services sustainably, even in the face of increasingly complex and novel hazards.
Metrics for long-term success related to water and energy systems include:
- Reduced service disruptions during actual compound hazard events compared to historical baselines
- Decreased recovery times following compound events
- Targeted investments in critical vulnerabilities identified through assessment
- Improved planning/response coordination between energy and water sectors
- Enhanced equity in service maintenance across different communities
AU - Giovando, Jeremy
A2 - Chen, Tse-Chun
A3 - Fang, Yilin
A4 - Feng, Sha
A5 - McPherson, Tim
A6 - Regier, Peter
A7 - Shi, Mingjie
A8 - Wang, Taiping
DB - Energy-Water Resilience
DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies
DO -
KW - compound hazards
KW - risk
KW - water systems
KW - energy systems
KW - hazard modeling
KW - data integration
KW - climate modeling
LA - English
DA - 2026/01/16
PY - 2026
PB - PNNL
T1 - Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems
UR - https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83
ER -
Giovando, Jeremy, et al. Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems. PNNL, 16 January, 2026, Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83.
Giovando, J., Chen, T., Fang, Y., Feng, S., McPherson, T., Regier, P., Shi, M., & Wang, T. (2026). Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems. [Data set]. Energy-Water Resilience. PNNL. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83
Giovando, Jeremy, Tse-Chun Chen, Yilin Fang, Sha Feng, Tim McPherson, Peter Regier, Mingjie Shi, and Taiping Wang. Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems. PNNL, January, 16, 2026. Distributed by Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83
@misc{EWR_Dataset_83,
title = {Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems},
author = {Giovando, Jeremy and Chen, Tse-Chun and Fang, Yilin and Feng, Sha and McPherson, Tim and Regier, Peter and Shi, Mingjie and Wang, Taiping},
abstractNote = {The focal area is identification and quantification of the risk of combined (compound) hazards on water and energy systems and their interactions. The existing challenge is addressing risk and consequences to energy and water systems by compound hazards is an emerging area of study. Individual hazards are typically well documented in the published literature, but information about combined risk and consequences still has many gaps. These gaps include:
1. Complexity of Hazard Interactions
2. Lack of Comprehensive Data and Inadequate Modeling Techniques
4. Regional Variability in Hazard Types and Policies
5. Uncertainty of Hazard Drivers and Compound Risk
Near-Term Opportunity: There are several opportunities for activities that could result in substantial gains in mitigating compound hazard effects on water and energy systems. Mitigation of compound hazards could have an immediate and high value impact on economic activities and public safety. A range of both physical and social science efforts is needed to identify, quantify, and communicate the existing and future risk of compound hazards. Progress towards addressing the risks for the energy and water systems requires an integration of federal, state, and local engagement. This engagement will consist of data sharing, numerical modeling, policy analysis, and public meetings. Near-term opportunities include:
1. Advances in Data Integration and Technologies
2. Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
3. Expansion of Climate and Hazard Modeling
4. Infrastructure Risk Assessments
5. Leveraging the National Risk Index
6. Resilience Policies
Success Measure: Success in quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems means improving the understanding of multi-hazard impacts, identifying critical vulnerabilities, and creating actionable pathways for mitigating risks. It also means transitioning from a reactionary system to one that is proactive, equitable, and resilient. These measures will ensure that critical infrastructure systems can continue to provide services sustainably, even in the face of increasingly complex and novel hazards.
Metrics for long-term success related to water and energy systems include:
- Reduced service disruptions during actual compound hazard events compared to historical baselines
- Decreased recovery times following compound events
- Targeted investments in critical vulnerabilities identified through assessment
- Improved planning/response coordination between energy and water sectors
- Enhanced equity in service maintenance across different communities},
url = {https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Energy-Water Resilience, PNNL, https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83},
note = {Accessed: 2026-04-12}
}
Details
Data from Jan 16, 2026
Last updated Jan 16, 2026
Submitted Jan 16, 2026
Contact
Jeremy Giovando
Authors
Keywords
compound hazards, risk, water systems, energy systems, hazard modeling, data integration, climate modelingDOE Project Details
Project Name White Papers on Ideas to Advance Energy-Water Resilience
Project Lead
Project Number WP-083
