Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems

Publicly accessible License 

The focal area is identification and quantification of the risk of combined (compound) hazards on water and energy systems and their interactions. The existing challenge is addressing risk and consequences to energy and water systems by compound hazards is an emerging area of study. Individual hazards are typically well documented in the published literature, but information about combined risk and consequences still has many gaps. These gaps include:

1. Complexity of Hazard Interactions
2. Lack of Comprehensive Data and Inadequate Modeling Techniques
4. Regional Variability in Hazard Types and Policies
5. Uncertainty of Hazard Drivers and Compound Risk

Near-Term Opportunity: There are several opportunities for activities that could result in substantial gains in mitigating compound hazard effects on water and energy systems. Mitigation of compound hazards could have an immediate and high value impact on economic activities and public safety. A range of both physical and social science efforts is needed to identify, quantify, and communicate the existing and future risk of compound hazards. Progress towards addressing the risks for the energy and water systems requires an integration of federal, state, and local engagement. This engagement will consist of data sharing, numerical modeling, policy analysis, and public meetings. Near-term opportunities include:

1. Advances in Data Integration and Technologies
2. Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
3. Expansion of Climate and Hazard Modeling
4. Infrastructure Risk Assessments
5. Leveraging the National Risk Index
6. Resilience Policies

Success Measure: Success in quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems means improving the understanding of multi-hazard impacts, identifying critical vulnerabilities, and creating actionable pathways for mitigating risks. It also means transitioning from a reactionary system to one that is proactive, equitable, and resilient. These measures will ensure that critical infrastructure systems can continue to provide services sustainably, even in the face of increasingly complex and novel hazards.

Metrics for long-term success related to water and energy systems include:
- Reduced service disruptions during actual compound hazard events compared to historical baselines
- Decreased recovery times following compound events
- Targeted investments in critical vulnerabilities identified through assessment
- Improved planning/response coordination between energy and water sectors
- Enhanced equity in service maintenance across different communities

Citation Formats

TY - DATA AB - The focal area is identification and quantification of the risk of combined (compound) hazards on water and energy systems and their interactions. The existing challenge is addressing risk and consequences to energy and water systems by compound hazards is an emerging area of study. Individual hazards are typically well documented in the published literature, but information about combined risk and consequences still has many gaps. These gaps include: 1. Complexity of Hazard Interactions 2. Lack of Comprehensive Data and Inadequate Modeling Techniques 4. Regional Variability in Hazard Types and Policies 5. Uncertainty of Hazard Drivers and Compound Risk Near-Term Opportunity: There are several opportunities for activities that could result in substantial gains in mitigating compound hazard effects on water and energy systems. Mitigation of compound hazards could have an immediate and high value impact on economic activities and public safety. A range of both physical and social science efforts is needed to identify, quantify, and communicate the existing and future risk of compound hazards. Progress towards addressing the risks for the energy and water systems requires an integration of federal, state, and local engagement. This engagement will consist of data sharing, numerical modeling, policy analysis, and public meetings. Near-term opportunities include: 1. Advances in Data Integration and Technologies 2. Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration 3. Expansion of Climate and Hazard Modeling 4. Infrastructure Risk Assessments 5. Leveraging the National Risk Index 6. Resilience Policies Success Measure: Success in quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems means improving the understanding of multi-hazard impacts, identifying critical vulnerabilities, and creating actionable pathways for mitigating risks. It also means transitioning from a reactionary system to one that is proactive, equitable, and resilient. These measures will ensure that critical infrastructure systems can continue to provide services sustainably, even in the face of increasingly complex and novel hazards. Metrics for long-term success related to water and energy systems include: - Reduced service disruptions during actual compound hazard events compared to historical baselines - Decreased recovery times following compound events - Targeted investments in critical vulnerabilities identified through assessment - Improved planning/response coordination between energy and water sectors - Enhanced equity in service maintenance across different communities AU - Giovando, Jeremy A2 - Chen, Tse-Chun A3 - Fang, Yilin A4 - Feng, Sha A5 - McPherson, Tim A6 - Regier, Peter A7 - Shi, Mingjie A8 - Wang, Taiping DB - Energy-Water Resilience DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies DO - KW - compound hazards KW - risk KW - water systems KW - energy systems KW - hazard modeling KW - data integration KW - climate modeling LA - English DA - 2026/01/16 PY - 2026 PB - PNNL T1 - Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems UR - https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83 ER -
Export Citation to RIS
Giovando, Jeremy, et al. Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems. PNNL, 16 January, 2026, Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83.
Giovando, J., Chen, T., Fang, Y., Feng, S., McPherson, T., Regier, P., Shi, M., & Wang, T. (2026). Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems. [Data set]. Energy-Water Resilience. PNNL. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83
Giovando, Jeremy, Tse-Chun Chen, Yilin Fang, Sha Feng, Tim McPherson, Peter Regier, Mingjie Shi, and Taiping Wang. Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems. PNNL, January, 16, 2026. Distributed by Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83
@misc{EWR_Dataset_83, title = {Quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems}, author = {Giovando, Jeremy and Chen, Tse-Chun and Fang, Yilin and Feng, Sha and McPherson, Tim and Regier, Peter and Shi, Mingjie and Wang, Taiping}, abstractNote = {The focal area is identification and quantification of the risk of combined (compound) hazards on water and energy systems and their interactions. The existing challenge is addressing risk and consequences to energy and water systems by compound hazards is an emerging area of study. Individual hazards are typically well documented in the published literature, but information about combined risk and consequences still has many gaps. These gaps include:

1. Complexity of Hazard Interactions
2. Lack of Comprehensive Data and Inadequate Modeling Techniques
4. Regional Variability in Hazard Types and Policies
5. Uncertainty of Hazard Drivers and Compound Risk

Near-Term Opportunity: There are several opportunities for activities that could result in substantial gains in mitigating compound hazard effects on water and energy systems. Mitigation of compound hazards could have an immediate and high value impact on economic activities and public safety. A range of both physical and social science efforts is needed to identify, quantify, and communicate the existing and future risk of compound hazards. Progress towards addressing the risks for the energy and water systems requires an integration of federal, state, and local engagement. This engagement will consist of data sharing, numerical modeling, policy analysis, and public meetings. Near-term opportunities include:

1. Advances in Data Integration and Technologies
2. Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
3. Expansion of Climate and Hazard Modeling
4. Infrastructure Risk Assessments
5. Leveraging the National Risk Index
6. Resilience Policies

Success Measure: Success in quantifying compound hazard risk to energy and water systems means improving the understanding of multi-hazard impacts, identifying critical vulnerabilities, and creating actionable pathways for mitigating risks. It also means transitioning from a reactionary system to one that is proactive, equitable, and resilient. These measures will ensure that critical infrastructure systems can continue to provide services sustainably, even in the face of increasingly complex and novel hazards.

Metrics for long-term success related to water and energy systems include:
- Reduced service disruptions during actual compound hazard events compared to historical baselines
- Decreased recovery times following compound events
- Targeted investments in critical vulnerabilities identified through assessment
- Improved planning/response coordination between energy and water sectors
- Enhanced equity in service maintenance across different communities}, url = {https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {Energy-Water Resilience, PNNL, https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/83}, note = {Accessed: 2026-04-12} }

Details

Data from Jan 16, 2026

Last updated Jan 16, 2026

Submitted Jan 16, 2026

Contact

Jeremy Giovando

Authors

Jeremy Giovando

PNNL

Tse-Chun Chen

PNNL

Yilin Fang

PNNL

Sha Feng

PNNL

Tim McPherson

PNNL

Peter Regier

PNNL

Mingjie Shi

PNNL

Taiping Wang

PNNL

DOE Project Details

Project Name White Papers on Ideas to Advance Energy-Water Resilience

Project Lead

Project Number WP-083

Share

Submission Downloads