Monitoring, Planning, and Management of Water Quality and Quantity for Resilient Water and Energy Systems

Publicly accessible License 

Both resilient systems where water is used for energy production and energy is used for treatment and operation depend not only on the quantity of water, but also quality and environmental health. Addressing gaps in environmental health and infrastructure condition/capability data will advance modeling, planning, management, and coordination at the intersection of the water and energy sectors.

Challenges such as increasing and excessive growth of algae and aquatic vegetation, the presence of pathogens or toxins can be a common occurrence. In several cases, these events have threatened or caused significant disruptions and impacted public health throughout the US. Existing monitoring techniques often fail to identify risks and treatment/conveyance infrastructure and to provide clean water for critical energy production, irrigation, or water supply.

Near-term opportunities to address the data and capability gaps that contribute to system failures or reactive responses include: 1) Identify areas with poor data coverage for near-real-time information about surface water supply systems and environmental health, 2) Document redundancies, mitigation capabilities, and flexibility in infrastructure operations and 3) Develop workflows to analyze information that crosses physical and management boundaries relevant to water-energy systems. These opportunities should lead to new data products such as synthesized reports of coverage and geospatial datasets describing multi-purpose system components (e.g., users, sources, quality constraints, etc.) as well as workflows that help connect and translate information across boundaries and data owners.

Success of these efforts would be assessed based on (1) the numbers of components that can be documented and (2) implementation of new approaches and connections within test cases. Ultimately, the positive impact of data and workflow improvements can be quantified in terms of reductions in system failures and losses as well as improved public health outcomes.

Citation Formats

TY - DATA AB - Both resilient systems where water is used for energy production and energy is used for treatment and operation depend not only on the quantity of water, but also quality and environmental health. Addressing gaps in environmental health and infrastructure condition/capability data will advance modeling, planning, management, and coordination at the intersection of the water and energy sectors. Challenges such as increasing and excessive growth of algae and aquatic vegetation, the presence of pathogens or toxins can be a common occurrence. In several cases, these events have threatened or caused significant disruptions and impacted public health throughout the US. Existing monitoring techniques often fail to identify risks and treatment/conveyance infrastructure and to provide clean water for critical energy production, irrigation, or water supply. Near-term opportunities to address the data and capability gaps that contribute to system failures or reactive responses include: 1) Identify areas with poor data coverage for near-real-time information about surface water supply systems and environmental health, 2) Document redundancies, mitigation capabilities, and flexibility in infrastructure operations and 3) Develop workflows to analyze information that crosses physical and management boundaries relevant to water-energy systems. These opportunities should lead to new data products such as synthesized reports of coverage and geospatial datasets describing multi-purpose system components (e.g., users, sources, quality constraints, etc.) as well as workflows that help connect and translate information across boundaries and data owners. Success of these efforts would be assessed based on (1) the numbers of components that can be documented and (2) implementation of new approaches and connections within test cases. Ultimately, the positive impact of data and workflow improvements can be quantified in terms of reductions in system failures and losses as well as improved public health outcomes. AU - Hansen, Carly A2 - DeRolph, Chris A3 - Allen-Dumas, Melissa A4 - Griffiths, Natalie A5 - Matson, Paul A6 - Pilla, Rachel A7 - Siddik, AB A8 - Stevenson, Louise A9 - Turner, Sean A10 - Johnson, Ryan DB - Energy-Water Resilience DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies DO - KW - water for energy KW - energy for treatment and distribution KW - water quality KW - environmental health KW - supply KW - data processing workflows KW - treatment KW - energy production KW - operation KW - modeling KW - planning KW - management KW - public health LA - English DA - 2026/01/15 PY - 2026 PB - ORNL T1 - Monitoring, Planning, and Management of Water Quality and Quantity for Resilient Water and Energy Systems UR - https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/105 ER -
Export Citation to RIS
Hansen, Carly, et al. Monitoring, Planning, and Management of Water Quality and Quantity for Resilient Water and Energy Systems. ORNL, 15 January, 2026, Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/105.
Hansen, C., DeRolph, C., Allen-Dumas, M., Griffiths, N., Matson, P., Pilla, R., Siddik, A., Stevenson, L., Turner, S., & Johnson, R. (2026). Monitoring, Planning, and Management of Water Quality and Quantity for Resilient Water and Energy Systems. [Data set]. Energy-Water Resilience. ORNL. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/105
Hansen, Carly, Chris DeRolph, Melissa Allen-Dumas, Natalie Griffiths, Paul Matson, Rachel Pilla, AB Siddik, Louise Stevenson, Sean Turner, and Ryan Johnson. Monitoring, Planning, and Management of Water Quality and Quantity for Resilient Water and Energy Systems. ORNL, January, 15, 2026. Distributed by Energy-Water Resilience. https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/105
@misc{EWR_Dataset_105, title = {Monitoring, Planning, and Management of Water Quality and Quantity for Resilient Water and Energy Systems}, author = {Hansen, Carly and DeRolph, Chris and Allen-Dumas, Melissa and Griffiths, Natalie and Matson, Paul and Pilla, Rachel and Siddik, AB and Stevenson, Louise and Turner, Sean and Johnson, Ryan}, abstractNote = {Both resilient systems where water is used for energy production and energy is used for treatment and operation depend not only on the quantity of water, but also quality and environmental health. Addressing gaps in environmental health and infrastructure condition/capability data will advance modeling, planning, management, and coordination at the intersection of the water and energy sectors.

Challenges such as increasing and excessive growth of algae and aquatic vegetation, the presence of pathogens or toxins can be a common occurrence. In several cases, these events have threatened or caused significant disruptions and impacted public health throughout the US. Existing monitoring techniques often fail to identify risks and treatment/conveyance infrastructure and to provide clean water for critical energy production, irrigation, or water supply.

Near-term opportunities to address the data and capability gaps that contribute to system failures or reactive responses include: 1) Identify areas with poor data coverage for near-real-time information about surface water supply systems and environmental health, 2) Document redundancies, mitigation capabilities, and flexibility in infrastructure operations and 3) Develop workflows to analyze information that crosses physical and management boundaries relevant to water-energy systems. These opportunities should lead to new data products such as synthesized reports of coverage and geospatial datasets describing multi-purpose system components (e.g., users, sources, quality constraints, etc.) as well as workflows that help connect and translate information across boundaries and data owners.

Success of these efforts would be assessed based on (1) the numbers of components that can be documented and (2) implementation of new approaches and connections within test cases. Ultimately, the positive impact of data and workflow improvements can be quantified in terms of reductions in system failures and losses as well as improved public health outcomes. }, url = {https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/105}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {Energy-Water Resilience, ORNL, https://ewr.openei.org/submissions/105}, note = {Accessed: 2026-06-10} }

Details

Data from Jan 15, 2026

Last updated Jan 15, 2026

Submitted Jan 15, 2026

Contact

Carly Hansen

Authors

Carly Hansen

ORNL

Chris DeRolph

ORNL

Melissa Allen-Dumas

ORNL

Natalie Griffiths

ORNL

Paul Matson

ORNL

Rachel Pilla

ORNL

AB Siddik

ORNL

Louise Stevenson

ORNL

Sean Turner

ORNL

Ryan Johnson

University of Utah

DOE Project Details

Project Name White Papers on Ideas to Advance Energy-Water Resilience

Project Lead

Project Number WP-105

Share

Submission Downloads